While they have no formal plans to announce opposition to a bill that would shorten the time local cities and counties can review cell tower applications, local leaders are keeping a close eye on House Bill 176.
The legislation would give local governments a 150-day window to consider approving or rejecting a cell tower application.
If the application hasn't been decided on within the 150 days, the tower would automatically be approved.
The bill, formally titled the Mobile Broadband Infrastructure Leads to Development (BILD) Act, last week was approved by the Georgia House Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee, chaired by the bill's chief sponsor East Cobb Republican State Representative Don Parsons.
Parsons recently told East Cobb Patch that the 150-day time frame is a lot more time than other Southern states currently allow and the towers would accommodate not only cell phones, but also devices that require bandwidth such as tablets.
Tell us: should the legislature approve H.B. 176?
Woodstock City Manager Jeff Moon said the Georgia Municipal Association is already on record opposing the bill.
"We don’t normally discuss resolutions on bills that GMA has already taken a position on," he said.
Woodstock Mayor Donnie Henriques said the City Council as a whole hasn't discuss the legislation.
"Anytime you try to take the rights away from municipalities...through zoning and governing, it's not a good thing," he added, noting he supports GMA's opposition to the legislation.
County Manager Jerry Cooper said the county is "monitoring" the bill closely. He noted he's reviewed the bill and added the Association County Commissioners of Georgia "will be recommending an amendment to address concerns with the bill."
ACCG is also on record opposing the bill.
Other cities in the region are publicly opposing the legislation. The Milton City Council last week approved a resolution opposing the bill and the city of Alpharetta is expected to approve a similar resolution.